User talk:OneUpOnUs

It has been 21 days since my last super duper scary death threat for editing Wikipedia...

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi OneUpOnUs! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 21:52, Wednesday, March 14, 2018 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
532	Cold reading (talk)	Add sources
358	Forgery (talk)	Add sources
47	Meridian Water (talk)	Add sources
77	El Dorado Jane Doe (talk)	Add sources
236	Vertebral subluxation (talk)	Add sources
886	Sorrel (talk)	Add sources
1,237	Identity theft (talk)	Cleanup
130	Cedar Falls, Iowa (talk)	Cleanup
381	Bank fraud (talk)	Cleanup
44	Autistic enterocolitis (talk)	Expand
754	Bali Nine (talk)	Expand
47	Moshe Feiglin (talk)	Expand
254	Province of New York (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
139	Preternatural (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
255	Pressure point (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
43	Mind–body interventions (talk)	Merge
693	University of South Carolina (talk)	Merge
969	Demonic possession (talk)	Merge
52	Bernard Cornfeld (talk)	Wikify
172	Methods of divination (talk)	Wikify
64	Mina Crandon (talk)	Wikify
4	Warnings About Vaccination Expectations NZ (talk)	Orphan
9	Sona Patel (talk)	Orphan
24	Islamic hospitals (talk)	Orphan
129	The Rooster Bar (talk)	Stub
11	Biological terrain assessment (talk)	Stub
20	Anthropomancy (talk)	Stub
145	Florence Parly (talk)	Stub
2	Faucette Building (talk)	Stub
2	South Main Street Commercial Historic District (Little Rock, Arkansas) (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:04, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Activated charcoal cleanse

Hi, just wanted to say great work on the article Activated charcoal cleanse! Detailed and well-developed. – Thjarkur (talk) 00:09, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Seconding this. I was browsing new articles and I saw your article on Kambo cleanse, it's quite interesting and well done. You might want to consider nominating it to appear on the Did you Know? section of the main page. :) SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 03:37, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Very kind of you to say, thank you! I might review the requirements and see if it's possible. OneUpOnUs (talk) 03:43, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Kambo cleanse

Hello! Your submission of Kambo cleanse at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, but clarification is needed regarding the image. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. By the way, amazing work on the article; I can tell you put a lot of work into it. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Toreightyone (talk) 18:07, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much :) OneUpOnUs (talk) 00:36, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 18:15, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rejuvenate WikiProject Skepticism

Hello - my name is Susan Gerbic (Sgerbic) and I'm writing to you because at some point you joined Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism. This might have been months ago - or even years ago. With the best of intentions the project was created years ago, and sadly like many WikiProjects has started to go dormant. A group of us are attempting to revitalize the Skepticism project, already we have begun to clean up the main page and I've just redone the participant page. No one is in charge of this project, it is member directed, which might have been the reason it almost went dormant. We are attempting to bring back conversations on the talk page and have two subprojects as well, in the hopes that it might spark involvement and a way of getting to know each other better. One was created several years ago but is very well organized and a lot of progress was made, Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism/Skeptical organisations in Europe. The other I created a couple weeks ago, it is very simple and has a silly name Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism/Skepticism Stub Sub-Project Project (SSSPP). This sub-project runs from March 1 to June 1, 2022. We are attempting to rewrite skepticism stubs and add them to this list. As you can see we have already made progress.

The reason I'm writing to you now is because we would love to have you come back to the project and become involved, either by working on one of the sub-projects, proposing your own (and managing it), or just hanging out on the talk page getting to know the other editors and maybe donate some of your wisdom to some of the conversations. As I said, no one is in charge, so if you have something in mind you would like to see done, please suggest it on the talk page and hopefully others will agree. Please add the project to your watchlist, update your personal user page showing you are a proud member of WikiProject Skepticism. And DIVE in, this is what the work list looks like [1] frightening at first glance, but we have already started chipping away at it.

The Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism/Participants page has gone though a giant change - you may want to update your information. And of course if this project no longer interests you, please remove your name from the participant list, we would hate to see you go, but completely understand.

Thank you for your time, I hope to edit with you in the future.Sgerbic (talk) 07:23, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mind your own business. You are from Australia with your socialist agenda. Stop editting Canadian articles. Sod off. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:3C81:3AD0:81DE:F707:EE1C:4169 (talk) 07:53, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck with that, lol OneUpOnUs (talk) 07:57, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

go suck a cuck you p is of sh y t. F o and die. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:3C81:3AD0:81DE:F707:EE1C:4169 (talk) 08:11, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orginal...Perhaps instead of name calling like a 5 year old you could contribute to the Vaccine Choice Canada page. Start a discussion on the talk page about your concerns, make valid arguements, bring citations. Wikipedia editors aren't the monsters the echo chambers make us out to be. If you make valid arguments and interesting points you will be listened to thoughtfully. Most importantly, bring citations for the changes you want to see happen. Peace brother.OneUpOnUs (talk) 08:19, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Watch this and then answer me

I insist you watch all this video and then answer me for why you censored me in trying to edit the truth about vaccines in Canada 2605:8D80:6C2:83AA:1940:7872:6891:2B7D (talk) 02:31, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

V. You tube. UM2jp6V0af8 2605:8D80:6C2:83AA:1940:7872:6891:2B7D (talk) 02:32, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stupid Wikipedia blocks YouTube links again more censorship 2605:8D80:6C2:83AA:1940:7872:6891:2B7D (talk) 02:32, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

to watch the video I'm talking about type out the YouTube link and then paste in this uid

UM2jp6V0af8 2605:8D80:6C2:83AA:1940:7872:6891:2B7D (talk) 02:33, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't seem to be going well for you and, so far, zero canadian ninjas have tracked me down (was so, so, so scared). No one here will respect anything you have to say until you start learning the rules of Wikipedia and what can, and cannot, be removed from a page without a discussion first. This will be the last time I engage with you no matter how many times you try to post to my page.OneUpOnUs (talk) 02:39, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

she didn't watch the video right? 2605:8D80:6C2:83AA:C68E:A251:8FC8:2771 (talk) 01:10, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

so you didn't watch the video right? 2605:8D80:6C2:83AA:C68E:A251:8FC8:2771 (talk) 01:11, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I note that the original poster (2605:8D80:6C2:83AA:1940:7872:6891:2B7D) has never edited any articles at all - including anything about vaccines. They have made a total of five edits ever, all of which were to this User Talk page (see here).--Gronk Oz (talk) 13:11, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So did you watch this video? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UM2jp6V0af8

Since I won my argument against you without doing anything you asked of me, I felt bad. I wanted to make you feel better by sending you a video of an Australian winning something: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWmSB7QN1UU

Thanks for being in my way while trying to edit something important for Canadians and humanity. I'm glad to see you winning again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:3C81:3AD0:4105:C4F7:90F0:238F (talk) 01:26, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]